Adversarials on dataset imdb via fgsm

Clean Text

One of those TV films you saw in the seventies that scared the hell out of you when you were a kid but still gives you an eerie feeling . No great actors or expensive production but everytime that phone rings ... ...

This movie was one of those movies where it completely fooled me into thinking that it was a cheesy 80 's slasher flick , based on the cover , but it was n't . It was quite possibly one of the worst slasher films that I have ever seen . The picture on the cover did not match any part or scene in the movie ; in fact it did n't involve a chainsaw . Not even the tag line fit the movie . The film is about a group of cheerleaders and two potheads who escape to a desolate cabin , in the cold woods , for a weekend getaway . However , things get extra chilly when they start to get murdered by an unknown killer . At the same time , the local sheriff 's department is hunting down a dangerous killer . I 'll name the problems in a list. < br / > < br / > 1 . The Acting . Boy was it cheap and horribly bad . It felt unnatural and it seemed as thought it was very scripted . None of the actors seemed as though they tried to perform with good intentions and therefore they seemed silly and tired . There was bad acting by all the characters in the movie , so I wo n't point out specific people , but I wills say that the stoners did a horrible job , as well as the police and the cheerleaders , which is not a surprise. < br / > < br / > 2 . The Plot . This story had set up a perfect storyline for good ol ' fashion slasher flick , but instead they peppered it with plot-holes , useless and unnecessary scenes and an overall stupid back-story to the killer 's intentions . There were major plot-holes including how the killer killed the last victim so quickly and yet still be there in the group of girls when it happened ? The ex-con virtually served no purpose in the movie aside from being a useless plot device . There was random and unnecessary sex and nudity sprinkled throughout it , even for a b-movie or my taste it was a bit too much . As for the killer 's intentions , lets just say it was stupid and it makes no sense as to

This is quite possible the worst movie ever made . I know people talk about how horrible Ed Wood movies were ( Plan 9 ) but this movie makes Plan 9 look amazing. < br / > < br / > Chuck Norris makes a cameo , for what reason I have no idea . Perhaps to ruin his movie career . Aside from Chuck Norris , the movie 's cast consists of extras in daytime soaps and Mike Norris ... that 's right , Chuck 's son. < br / > < br / > This director does n't even have a resume and I have no idea where the plot or screenplay originated . This must 've been green lit by a horrible Southern Baptist minister that somehow had a 3rd cousin that owned a studio ( which I 'm sure has since been shut down ) . < br / > < br / > I do n't really know what else to say about this movie . I would like to give you a plot summary but I 'm lost . There is something about Jesus and Satan ... some eternal battle . Other than that there are Indians . And a bunch of freaky kids that do n't know how to act ... they 're just awkward and should not be on camera . I do n't know what was going on most of the time but I know the movie was a great laugh . Mike Norris pushes his daughter ( on her bike ) into the street somehow ... but in the shot he 's in the middle of the park . So somehow she learns to ride her bike with speed equivalent to that of The Flash and gets hit by a car or bus ... I do n't know . But she 's dead . This is actually the funniest scene in the movie . I know that sounds sick but once you see Mike raise his hands in victory and then hold his head and scream in terror ... you 'll understand . It does n't show the daughter getting hit or anything ... you just have to assume she got hit by some vehicle . But , the movie 's not clear . So maybe it was completely unrelated and she died from cancer . Anyway ... after that

This was one of the biggest pieces of crap I have ever had to watch . I mean , seriously . How would anybody else feel if they were in Woody Harrelson 's shoes and your wife was even CONSIDERING it would be a good idea to sleep with the other guy even for a million bucks . After all , she was the one talking about it in bed and saying how it would be good for them since he can build his house or whatever with that money . Woody never fully agreed to it until she talked him into it . How CAN you trust her ? Who the hell would actually even consider that if they were married ? I do n't care how desperate they were . That 's the most ridiculous thing I have ever heard in my life . Then , he flips out on her . Apparently , he had no right to mistrust her , other than the fact that his wife just slept with another dude who is extremely rich and handsome . Oh and wait , then he 's supposed to apologize to HER after she files for the divorce so she can be with the guy she slept with . Of course Woody has no right to say anything to her or mistrust her especially after she still has Roy Hobb 's card in her wallet . Then , at the end of the movie , she 's apparently so in love with Woody still and misses him so much , that she was not going to leave Hobbs until he made some ridiculously stupid story up to try to hint to her to leave , and she bleeping thanks Hobbs ? ? ? ? Are you bleeping kidding me ? Was she under contract as his sex slave or something ? ? I mean what the bleep ? ? Oh and wait it gets better . She bleeping kisses him passionately before she gets out of the car . Yea , she 's not a whore . Oh , thank you for letting me go , let me go make out with you one last time for good ole ' sake . Smooch smooch , smooch even though I 'm still married to a guy I left for a rich guy . I have never seen such

I had to see this on the British Airways plane . It was terribly bad acting and a dumb story . Not even a kid would enjoy this . Something to switch off if possible .

After reading the book , Heart of Darkness , the movie did not do it justice . The movie puts the book to shame and anyone who has not experienced the book would frown upon the story and plot because it was portrayed so poorly by the movie . In the film , the characters and set were just some of the let downs that occurred in the movie . The director left out so many important and interesting aspects of the book that made it one of the best literary works ever made. < br / > < br / > Of course any book is better than the movie but these were n't even comparable . Joseph Conrad as a writer was brilliant in vocabulary and the cleverness of the written word . The movie does n't even start to show any of this . Some of the very important and influential scenes from the book were completely left out , like how Kurtz was not in the boat when he died . Also when Marlow went to deliver the news to Kurtz 's intended , she reacted differently in the movie , rather than the book . Another major difference was that Marlow saw the picture of the lady that was blindfolded at the end of the movie , not at the beginning , like the book . This was influential on how the audience perceived Marlow , and the movie totally messed that up. < br / > < br / > The book was so fine tuned on what every location looked like , but the scenery in the movie was a let down . There was a bunch of cheesy fake backgrounds and to compliment , a bunch of bad actors to go along with it . There was one exception to the awful actors and that would be Isaach De Bankolé , who played zulchzulu . His character was depicted the best . Though the movie was n't that great , I still would recommend it ONLY if you have read and understood the book very well . That way , you can see what the differences are in the movie and book and contemplate them . If you have not read the book , I do not recommend the movie because it is a boring , lifeless mess . I loved the

I saw this movie with a friend who ran a marathon with me , and we both had the same feeling about it : it was n't terribly motivating , and did n't even broach the idea of what a training schedule would look like , so that zulchzulu could have an idea of what it would take for them to train and run one . In fact there was almost zero technical information at all . I did n't expect this to be a tech-heavy instructional video , but when that info was near zero then the film just was n't balanced , and was n't particularly useful to zulchzulu contemplating their first run. < br / > < br / > There were other problems . Some of the very first images were people collapsing near death while trying to run a race . Yeah , real inspiring . The timing was also hard to follow , because it was semi chronological , but the filmmakers rarely gave you any good clues as to what point in time you were looking at . And they withheld information . You see that Kantor has an injury , and you just assume it 's from all her training , but then several scenes later they finally clue you in that it 's because she tripped over a pine cone in her yard. < br / > < br / > Some parts were very good , though , like the bit about a woman defying race officials who wanted the run to be men-only , and the coverage of a Chicago race where two of the runners portrayed earlier were vying for first place. < br / > < br / > Off the top of my head , I 'm thinking of other chronological documentaries , like Supersize Me , and Grass , where you always know where you are , and you feel like they told you everything you wanted to know. < br / > < br / > In short , it would n't have been hard to make a better marathon film , and as it stands I ca n't recommend this to zulchzulu to educate and motivate them to try one , because I do n't think it will have that effect .

Kasparov vs . Deep Blue is no doubt a fascinating story , but I do n't think you 'd know it by watching this movie . I think it focuses too much on the conspiracy theory that IBM cheated ... and what does this theory hinge upon ? The idea that at one point the computer made a move that `` looked human '' . I am not a chess grandmaster or a computer scientist . And while I do n't doubt that the move looked human , to me it does n't seem beyond the realm of possibility that the most powerful chess-playing computer ever created could make a surprising move ... or that such a machine could beat even a genius like Kasparov . The movie gets way too much mileage out of this theory , and not enough out of the personalities of the people involved ... that could have made it a much more interesting story . The direction also relies way too much on the conceits of a pointlessly whispered narration , and the imagery of an 18th century chess-playing machine that looks like one of those animatronic gypsy fortunetellers you see at the carnival . Also the story was slowed down by many empty shots of Kasparov revisiting `` the scene of the crime '' . I do n't doubt that Kasparov and the chess community found IBM 's behavior vexing , but I do n't think it 's any different than you would find from any other big corporation . At the end of the movie , you are left with the feeling that Kasparov is a huge crybaby and the Deep Blue programmers are either victims or cheats . I think if the filmmaker wanted the viewer to believe the conspiracy theory ( which he almost certainly did ) , he should have presented a lot more evidence . In fact , more evidence would have been a good idea in the first place . The whole thing left me with a sour taste in my mouth .

Low budget horror about an evil force . Hard to believe in this day and age , but way back when this stuff actually used to get theatrical release ! These days this sort of thing would either go direct-to-video or straight to cable . Should n't be too hard to avoid this one ; who 's ever heard of it ?

I borrowed this on DVD from a friend the other day . I did n't really know what to expect . I have n't seen a lot of Russian movies , and i do n't think i 've ever seen a Russian war movie . Maybe that made me expect something different , something more along the line of an imagined Russian mentality . But whatever those expectations came from , they were put to shame as this is a quite ordinary war movie. < br / > < br / > The whole formula of following a few young people from their recruitment , through training , to deployment and through some battles , is well known . We have seen it done both many years ago , as well as more recently ( as with Jarhead ) . Sure , there 's a difference here because the movie is about Russian soldiers instead of Americans as is almost always the case . But in general this could just as easily have been a zulchzulu . I guess that just underscores my feeling that Afghanistan was the Soviet unions Vietnam . A country that should have been a pushover for a superpower made the war drag on for years with terrible loss of life both for soldiers and zulchzulu < br / > < br / > The good points in this movie i felt were good photography ( there are some beautiful ambiance shots ) and decent effects for what i guess must have been a rather low budget movie . What made me disappointed is mostly the story itself . It just does n't manage to stir any emotion in me . Mostly because the character development is lousy . And to really feel something when people are gunned down you have to make them people , not just faceless cardboard cutouts . They fail to do that in this movie . Also it 's overly long , and that seems to a kind of trend lately . In my opinion a movie that 's more than two hours long has to have a lot to offer , and this movie does n't cut it . Also there is a disturbing music that 's put like a wet blanket over every scene . Especially in the action scenes this is highly disturbing , not that you need

This could have been great . The voice-overs are exactly right and fit the characters to a T. One small problem though ; the look of the characters , mostly the supporting or guest characters look exactly the same . The same bored look on every face only with minor changes such as hairlines or weight size . It looks kind of odd to see a really big guest star 's voice coming out of a lifeless form like the characters here . If I am not mistaken Kathy Griffin did a voice-over for this show and it looked too odd to be funny. < br / > < br / > There is a few other problems , one being the family plot . The Simpsons did it much better where you could actually buy most of the situations the characters got themselves into . Here we get too much annoying diversions , like someone having a weird fantasy and then we are supposed to find that funny but for some reason the delivery is a bit off . As you can probably tell it is hard for me to put a finger on exactly what is wrong with this show because it basically nothing more than a clone of the Simpsons or even more `` Married with Children '' . < br / > < br / > If I should point a finger on what is totally wrong with this it probably is it 's repetitiveness . Peter Griffin is not really a bright character but neither are any of the others . Lois should have been named Lois Lame because she is sort of one-dimensional . Seth Green as the kind of retarded son is the best thing about this show and that is the most stereotypical part on the show. < br / > < br / > So what more can I say . There is n't exactly anything wrong with this show but in the long run you have to admit that it takes a lot of work to do what the Simpsons has done for almost two decades .

Okay , first of all , I missed like the first 15 minutes of the movie , so I missed credits and stuff . SO when I finally got to it , I was like `` Who the hell is this dude ? '' . I found out it was Flex like hours after watching the movie . < br / > < br / > Flex did n't look like Michael Jackson . Not one bit . He could n't dance like him , or move like him , the only thing he almost had was the voice . People commented on Elizabeth Taylor , but I ca n't really comment on that because I do n't know much about her . < br / > < br / > The whole movie was like just plain wack . The dialogue sucked . The zulchzulu it can be called zulchzulu . The soundtrack sucked . The acting sucked . Yes even Flex ... I 'm so upset about it though . I did n't want it to suck . I 'm so sad that Flex got told he can get away with it . But the whole thing looked like dress-up . You know ? It 's like , nobody looked like they were supposed to except for Joseph Jackson . < br / > < br / > The concert sequences just sucked . I 'm sorry , but Flex just ca n't dance like Michael . I mean , like what the hell was VH1 thinking ? The makeup did n't even match like the time of whatever Michael was going through . For example , in the movie he was still dark when Neverland got raided the first time around . In real life , MJ was white as hell . There was some sort of stupid delay in his skin discoloring . < br / > < br / > The movie was n't boring , well for me it was n't . It was n't really anything . I was just so upset about everything that was wrong with it . I wanted to see how it turned out and if Flex could redeem himself . He did n't , really . The only part I found like a bit interesting was the whole Lisa Marie thing . When they fell in love .

After his success with A Nightmare on Elm Street in 1984 , director Wes Craven for some reason decided that his next project would be this TV movie . I 'm not a big fan of this director on the whole ; early exploitation flick The Last House on the Left as well as his modern slasher Scream sit well with me , but the rest of his work is very hit and miss and I 'd hesitate to call him the master that others have labelled him as . The main theme here is cryogenic freezing , although it 's more a springboard for the plot rather than an important part of the movie . The main influence here is obviously the excellent 1974 zombie film Deathdream and we focus on Miles Creighton ; a businessman cryogenically frozen for ten years before an accident that means he has to be thawed out immediately . Miles is a part of a project for people that are ill ; they pay to be frozen in the hope that they will be revived in the future when their illnesses can cured . Miles is successfully revived and it 's seen as a miracle ... but the person that wakes up is not the person who was frozen , as Miles returns without a soul. < br / > < br / > This film could actually have been quite decent judging by the idea behind it , but instead we 're given a plot that does n't really have a lot to it and it has to be said that Craven does n't make the best out of the potential of the film . The zulchzulu ' is the main focal point , but it would seem that not having a soul and simply having a murderous zulchzulu compassion are the same thing , which feels a bit unimaginative . The film was made for television so it 's not particularly nasty and it 's obvious that not a lot of money was spent on it as the whole production feels very cheap . Michael Beck never became a very popular actor and that is n't surprising judging by his performance here ; while he is passable , he largely lacks charisma and is not formidable in the central role . The plot does n't flow too badly but there 's a

zulchzulu SPOILERS zulchzulu < br / > < br / > What a long and mostly uninteresting movie ! Who were these characters ? Why did n't I care about them ? If I 'm going to watch a movie for two hours , I 'd like to care about somebody or something . < br / > < br / > We know that Salvatore dreamed of the riches to be found in the new world . Beyond that , though , we learned little about most of his family 's hopes , fears , etc. , as they embarked on an adventure into the unknown. < br / > < br / > And why was Lucy even in this movie ? She said little ; we knew little about her or what she was doing ( was she forced to service men in exchange for being allowed to board the ship ? ) or what her plans were upon reaching New York . To those who might suggest that she was needed to underscore the point that a single woman , however cultured , could not get into this country alone , I say that that fact is not enough justification to give her so much screen time . That point could have been made in five minutes , with Lucy as a momentary character. < br / > < br / > More questions : Why was n't the twin brother at the boat to meet the family ? We heard about the brother , and some closure on that point would have been helpful in giving the movie some cohesiveness . Also , how long was the journey from Italy to New York ? Given the conditions on the ship , it makes a difference to the viewer if the voyage took five or 10 or 50 days . ( Someone said something about seeing land a `` week '' at one point , but I think that was when they were already en route . ) I needed these types of details to better appreciate what they were going through. < br / > < br / > The only scene I really liked was when the boat , filled with passengers , left the dock . < br / > < br / > If you choose to rent this movie , do

( spoiler ) it could be the one the worst movie you see , you might like it like I did I really like it . Its one of those odds movie . < br / > < br / > There is man who seen to have a had day in life . Blacks rats some how feel sorry him ( which I think was a good Idea ) . < br / > < br / > The killer rats become friends with man two big man come making feel unwanted so the man set the killer rat on them and floor to floor both bodies covered in big black rats not that much blood. < br / > < br / > but think about big black rats all over body ) but start to little killing people but rats are going zulchzulu until the rats kills his friends and girlfriends , < br / > < br / > Ther one scene in were seating on the toilet while rats are going into the pipes leading to toilet and rat goes up his you know and come out of his mouth , ( which mean the rats must off eaten everything inside in body 's ) I had me laughing for weeks < br / > < br / > why did i like this movie , yes it 's different of the rest , I for ONE like it when little creature takes on mankind . < br / > < br / > if you have seen any of these movie slugs , slither , Them , spiders , snakes , tremors , Cujo , crocodile , shark , zulchzulu < br / > < br / > If you liked them and check out Hood rats , < br / > < br / > it better then Terror toons that all I Can say (((:)))) ! 4/10

I would not deny that I have quite enjoyed watching any Japanese horror films , but everyone must get quite fed up with them after you have seen the same thing over and over. < br / > < br / > The film follows the story of the Grudge . Audrey , as requested by her mom , is going to get her sister back . But when she arrives , something strange happens to her sister and then her sister is killed . She wants to find out the truth behind the curse and later a photographer ( Eason ) joins her . On the other hand , there 's also something happening to a family and three girls , but they seem to realise it too late ... < br / > < br / > In fact , I ca n't see the points for the three girls from international school to appear in the movies as they 're not ( quite ) related to the story . The reason why the woman holding the grudge keeps killing people is still not very clear ( it seems to me they 're just telling the same things I saw in the grudge ) . And the sudden appearance of Audrey in front of the boy is undoubtedly odd , which I suppose is an attempt to make the story about the family related . The killing scenes are absolutely the mixture of those in the Ring and Shibuya kaidan . The acting would be another bad point . As a Hong Konger I would really like to support Edison Chen 's first effort in Hollywood , but as a film lover I really ca n't find any point to support bad acting . Other actors like the father , though he just appears in a few scenes , should also have done better . What is kept good is the atmosphere of the film , especially when I watched it in the middle of the night alone. < br / > < br / > If you have time , really enjoy any horror films and have seen all the possible horror films except this , like me , you can go for it to kill some time . But if you really like Japanese horror films of this kind , you should spend some time watching

What do you mean son of actor , not an actor . You do n't become an actor just because your daddy is a superstar -- zulchzulu does n't work that way , not in UK at any rate. < br / > < br / > Macbeth ( this version ) is a low budget Scottish movie . You ca n't compare this to the Polanski version because Polanski has all the budgets in the world . < br / > < br / > Jason acted throughout school , but his big break came in 1985 , when he landed the role of Robin Hood in Britain 's `` Robin of Sherwood '' television series . He has appeared in many films since then , including `` Shanghai Noon '' and `` Lord of the Rings zulchzulu . Jason has since moved behind the camera , forming the production company , Unconditional Entertainment . He recently wrapped filming on his latest movie , which stars Cuba Gooding , Jr. and Ray Winstone . < br / > < br / > And all this has nothing to do with being the son of Sean Connery . If you think Jason said to Sean , `` daddy , I wan na be in Macbeth movie that they are going to film , '' and Sean said , `` sure , son , whatever you say , '' and made a phone call and got his son the role , you are mistaken . In fact , Jason Connery is being cut out of his father 's will . Seeing as how his father is Sean Connery , that 's a big chunk of change Jason will be losing out on . The reasoning behind the decision is apparently Sean 's strong feelings that his only son should learn to provide for himself . The relationship has become fairly strained , with Jason even threatening to change his name . < br / > < br / > -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Of being the son of Sean Connery , < br / > < br / > '' I realize that I 'm always going to be compared to my father . There are innuendos all the time . Should I spend my whole life

If a movie has an unimaginative , hackneyed story and bland characters it needs to make up for it by being really , really funny . You can get away with a lot if you 're funny . But while there are a few amusing moments scattered here and there in Grandma 's Boy , they are so far and few between that they can not begin to make up for the hack work the film displays in such zulchzulu < br / > < br / > The movie certainly does n't aim to surprise anyone . When Alex hides marijuana in his grandma 's house in a tea tin you know what 's going to happen later on and it does . The movie appears to have been written by a committee who did a study of mediocre comedies and grabbed any gag that appeared in more than one of them. < br / > < br / > The most interesting thing about the movie is its somewhat unusual setting . The game takes place in a video game development company , which should be an interesting source for some clever comedy . But do n't be fooled , this is not a movie about video game developers . This is basically a college frat house movie in which all the frat boys have been shoved into a big room to play video games. < br / > < br / > The way the movie completely fails to think through its setting and use it for original laughs can be seen in the character of J.P. J.P. is I think more-or-less conspired by the creator of Doom , John Carmack . At least inspired to the extent that he 's an odd genius who makes games. < br / > < br / > In the movie , J.P. is a weird , obnoxious geek who is despised and jeered by the company game testers . That makes no sense at all . If you are one of the most significant people in the history of video games ( as J.P. is supposed to be ) then even if you 're quirky and obnoxious , people will still admire and respect you on some level . If Stephen Hawking is obnoxious his associates still are n't going to make jun of him to his face. <

One wonders about the state of a society that produce a father like Albert T. Fitzgerald , who we first meet on a plane , as he is heading toward the place he abandoned a long time ago , and where he left a wife and a child who is now accused of murdering a mentally challenged boy . When we first see him , he has caught a headline in the paper the woman in front of him is reading . Rather rudely , he asks her if he could have the newspaper , and the lady offers other sections . Well , that 's not what he asked , what he wants the woman to do , is to give him the front section she is reading. < br / > < br / > Matthew Ryan Hoge wrote and directed this disturbing film that reflects , in many ways , our society as it is today . In fact , Mr. Hoge is pointing out exactly at what is wrong with it. < br / > < br / > The film presents Leland , a teen ager who ca n't even differentiate between fantasy and reality . It 's evident that killing a human being , even the sweet and innocent boy who has n't done anything to deserve it , will have fatal consequences , not only for himself , but for his own family , and the family of the slain boy . In fact , Leland seems to have no idea about what motivated him to commit the crime for he does not show any repentance about it. < br / > < br / > It 's obvious Leland has been traumatized by his parents divorce . His own father is an aloof man who could n't care less about him . It 's Pearl , the teacher in the juvenile detention center who sees the turmoil inside the young man and wants to help , but unfortunately , he does n't have a chance. < br / > < br / > The best thing in the film is Don Cheadle , a great actor who always delivers . The ensemble cast does good work under Mr. Hoge 's direction . Kevin Spacey has a good opportunity playing the egotistical father of the accused murderer and makes us detest him for

Looking at the ratings you would assume this is a classic , but yet again its just another example of poor independent film makers trying to drum up interest in their movie . They are n't even being smart about it 10/10 in the votes ? I guess that to buck the curve and offset all the 1/10 's it will get . Is this better than any decent zombie movie ? No. < br / > < br / > Acting , corny and zulchzulu < br / > < br / > Sound effects , cheap and nasty , if it was n't for where the actors looked you would n't know where it was coming from. < br / > < br / > Cinematography . These people act like they have borrowed their dads camera right after watching the matrix . Less is more , but more from this team is absolutely zulchzulu < br / > < br / > Zombies are rubbish as well . I do n't doubt most of these people will never be heard from again , and it will be for good reason . I hope zombies eat their eyes as this was 90 minutes of pap that I wont get back. (((=)))) < br / > < br / > And falsifying ratings just makes it a million times worse. < br / > < br / > One reviewer said it was one of the best horror movies he has seen in the last 30 years ? I can only assume that his recent cornea transplant was a success then. < br / > < br / > Watch the trailer as thats a warning as to how bad this film is .

Where the hell did VH1 find the scriptwriter for this movie ? ? ? Out of high school ? This movie tries so hard to be sympathetic to Michael Jackson , but instead , turns him into a horrible , tacky caricature . All the lines are filled with clichés but surprisingly the acting was n't bad . As usual , this is a bad movie with pretty good actors . The actor that plays Michael Jackson , jeez , I feel sorry for him ! I think he did the best he could with the weak script . I did n't mind that Flex did not look like Michael Jackson , I thought he did the best he could , but later on when he had all that white make-up on , oh man , did he look yucky ! The other actors that played Debbie Rowe , Priscilla Presley and Elizabeth Taylor were pretty good . Except that the actress that plays Liz Taylor looked too young and healthy to be playing Liz . The actress that plays Diana Ross did n't look at all like her and I could n't figure out who this woman was until much later on in the movie. < br / > < br / > This movie does a disservice to everyone who is on the side of Michael Jackson , or against Michael Jackson . It does n't do anything to change anyone 's opinion . As a matter of fact , the only opinion anyone will have after watching this movie is , oh God , this movie really , really sucks ! And where the hell is Michael Jackson 's wonderful music and songs ? There are none to be found in this movie . I love the soundtrack to this movie anyway and I 'll probably purchase it if I could. < br / > < br / > On the lighter side though , this is a very funny , campy movie ! It 's a great time waster if you want to watch something light that wo n't trouble your brain too much . I 'll probably watch it again , because it just is so entertainingly bad !

I know that Full Moon , or any other film studio for that matter , could never recapture the fun and cheesy sci-fi feeling that was the original zulchzulu . ' And with the last two entries in the series having Jack Deth in medieval times instead of futuristic Los Angeles , it became quite obvious that there really was little hope in reviving the Trancers series . Breathing new life into a film is one thing , but taking our main character out of his element and putting him into the past , well , it did n't work ! So now with Trancers 6 , Full Moon has breathed so much new life into the series that we do n't even deal with Jack Deth any more . We now deal with his daughter , Jo . Jack is in her body and must go into the past and fight the Trancers one more time. < br / > < br / > zulchzulu SPOILER : FIRST SCENE OF THE FILM zulchzulu < br / > < br / > To prove how bad this movie is , you only need watch the first two minutes of the film when the original Jack Deth appears on the screen . But it 's not actually Tim Thomerson . It 's clips of him and sound bytes strung together ( trust me , you can tell they 're strung together ) horribly to provide the viewer the last of the true Jack Deth humor . And from this point on , things only go down hill . Having this girl , Jo Deth , as our main character while Jack Deth is supposed to be in her body , is the worst idea in the world . Having this cute young woman act as a rough and tough man is n't the right track at all ! It does n't work and it really comes off as zulchzulu < br / > < br / > I 'm not going to go into the aspects of special effects and makeup because most reading this know what Full Moon has become : A really , really , low budget enterprise . I do n't know what to say about this movie , except I really wish Full Moon could be like it was in the days of Demonic Toys , Puppet

This is one of those films that you watch with a group of people . You will have the best time . It 's really , really bad , like Showgirls bad but without the quality of zulchzulu < br / > < br / > You 've got the best mix of bad actors , bad director and bad script here . Everything that can possible be wrong that can make for an entertaining evening , you have here . The first being the tag line is `` a bunch of teenagers ... '' These people are as much `` teenagers '' as my zulchzulu < br / > < br / > The director has zero sense of suspense or tension . The 30 year old `` teenagers '' are standing around and the `` monster '' comes out and attacks and this pretty much happens throughout the movie when the monsters are revealed . There is no suspense building up to this or surprise or anything . It 's more like when you were kids pretending to be chased by monsters and just kind of made up stuff as you went . And when I use the word `` monsters '' I exaggerate . More like a couple guys in Halloween masks bought at the .99 cent store. < br / > < br / > There is no doubt this script was spun off in a couple days , no rewrites and I can only imagine how bad and poorly formatted it looked on the page because it was clearly written by an amateur with no clue . It 's another example of one of the bad things about this day and age : anyone can make a movie. < br / > < br / > But of course the best bad thing about this film is the acting . It 's as bad as you can get . There is n't one person in this who has the slightest skill at acting and the lead is the absolute worst . He delivers every line in this monotone manner without any expression and you have to wonder how someone this bad could possible get a part in any movie , no matter who he knows . When he had to `` cry '' when his girlfriend was killed , it was one of the funniest

I have walked out of a Coen movie before and not quite known how to feel . The two best examples of that are The Big Lebowski and Fargo . Lebowski was so ridiculously original and so filled with strange humour that I had to like it . On the other hand , there were some unnecessary reveries with flying people and killer bowling balls that just did n't seem to fit the mold of the film . Still , I liked the film and now own a copy of it . Fargo made me howl with hysterics , sometimes I was n't sure why I was laughing so hard that it made me cry , but nonetheless I was . There were many seemingly strange characters in Fargo , but upon further investigation , they were really just real people talking about real situations . That is why the man with the shovel ( or was it a broom ) was so side-splittingly funny when he was telling the police officer about some funny looking man down at the bar the other night . And that is also why the theater erupted in laughter when he then says that there are some funny looking clouds coming in . ( I own a copy of this film too ) The Coen 's have a way of masking their film and their characters as being somewhat eccentric and perhaps a little off the wall . But if you look closer at some of those same characters that seem zany , you will always find that in some strange way , they all ring true . That is what is quite exceptional about O Brother Where Art Thou ? This is a film that is out there . I mean it is not even in the same ballpark as a traditional film . I reviewed the film Shaft this past summer and in it I said that Shaft was an okay film that I have seen a thousand times before . But you can not say that about a Coen Brother 's film and you most certainly can not say that about this one. < br / > < br / > This film has everything in it from a jail break , crooked southern politicians , muses , references to what I can only assume are historical figures , riverside baptisms

I 'm so sorry , but I have to tell this film was the most terrible I have ever seen before . I thought that it will be a good film after 8mm . WHAT A SELL ! ! ! There were nothing interesting in it , except the beautiful Hungarian women . Everything might be known forward . It 's a miracle I did n't sleep trough all . I do n't understand how might you let make it ! ! I 'm so sorry , but I have to tell this film was the most terrible I have ever seen before . I thought that it will be a good film after 8mm . WHAT A SELL ! ! ! There were nothing interesting in it , except the beautiful Hungarian women . Everything might be known forward . It 's a miracle I did n't sleep trough all . I do n't understand how might you let make it ! !

As someone already said the Living Dead Dolls were cute and if they came out as a new series of Wicked little things I would buy one , or two . Well basically this film was dark , not in the scary sense but in that I cant see kinda way . And it was boring . Three females in a house , the youngest told not to go into the woods under any circumstances ( well that did n't sink in ) and it would have been better if that advice had involved their death . And does n't anyone do any cleaning or whitewashing or something , you would think a lot of coughing would ensue . A sexy young mum where you waste your time trying to figure her age ( by my calculations 34 or 36 . ) And it looked like it had been longer than 20 years since someone had lived there so what was with the fathers young adult photos on much older album ? I am so tired of clichés that is just lazy writing , and here they come in thick and fast . Teens getting stoned and drunk in car and well you know where that leads ... zulchzulu and apparent deafness too as Tim seems oblivious to his friends scream . I mean I have pushed many a car where the instructing driver did not scream and I heard them . Cliché weird man in the woods who no one believes . Plumber who has lived in them there parts for years and this is his first experience with said children , so that driving along he avoids pickaxe wielding youngster in dead of night ... run him over you idiot ! Cliché ... roaming about in woods without a clue about where you are going , armed with knowledge that pick-axe wielding kids ( yes them again ) are out and about . Senseless scene the brutalising of pig ... why do so many directors see no problem with animal mutilation and slaughter ? I would have much rather seen the kiddies run up and bit people on the thighs than this . Zombies do n't appear to have that much energy in other films.The villain well how ineffectual was he ? His big part was in the zulchzulu tramping in and demanding to be served first .

Now that 's it 's 2008 , who really has a care in the world about a guy like DB Sweeney , even back then he was n't a big deal. < br / > < br / > Two Tickets to Paradise is an outlined story that 's well and true where three friends hit the road under each of their personal circumstances . Again , a proved plot . The problem with this film , other than it 's zulchzulu bad it 's compelling ' title , is the script. < br / > < br / > Cliché after cliché three guys do the same things you 've seen in every other road movie ... and blow up vanna white 's house. < br / > < br / > John C. McGinley 's acting job is superb , especially compared to that of the late DB Sweeney 's . ( His career is dead , hence the late . though i hear he 's moving to TV , good for him ) . Also , John C likely has the least awful character in the film. < br / > < br / > The score is so generic it actually feels like you 're watching a third rate film from 1993 , or Jeff Anderson 's movie Now You Know ( also set me back a few years , but at least that was more entertaining . ) I mean , yah , i guess i enjoyed parts of it . But , the nerdy guy is annoying , DB tries to be this cool failed guitar player ( with some rough influences , like some of the worst of classic rock ) who has some strange relationship with a stripper , and John C is a gambler who 's wife and kid leave him after the death of his father as well as a visit from one of his bookie 's zulchzulu < br / > < br / > I keep thinking up ways to make this movie better . But i think burning the script would have been a healthy start. < br / > < br / > But , as i 've hinted this whole time , it 's not the worst movie ever . And any chance i have to see McGinley in a starring role , i 'll

i thought id check this film out as I 'm currently making a film about a mysterious box , therefore it would be great to see how this film took and developed the idea of a mysterious and unexpected box. < br / > < br / > before going to the cinema i had a high expectation of this film . with actresses , like Cameron diaz you would expect the acting especially hers to be great . the acting was a sort of let down for the film , the characters accents changed throughout the film it made it zulchzulu < br / > < br / > the whole idea of a weird box that can make your dreams come true but destroy others is such a brilliant story but i feel the director let it down , this film had potential it could of been a lot lot better than it was. < br / > < br / > this film had no middle to it . it was too confusing and needed a steady storyline . nobody wants to go into the cinema and come out thinking what have i just watched zulchzulu did n't get it at all , ' sometimes it can be exciting and make people want to watch it again , but this film made people want to never ever want to hear of the film again . throughout watching i noticed that half the audience had left before the ending . i feel every single person had been let down watching this film because of the high expectations and how slow parts of the film was. < br / > < br / > lets put the bad points to one side ... i did like however the scene where the son is in the bathroom at the end . it was unexpected , it reminded me of a horror movie and the way it was put together made me imagine it and how devastating and scary it would of been to be in that position . the lighting and the effects made it look excellent , this scene looked slightly more 1990 's than the 1970 's that this film is supposed to be. < br / > < br / > this film was confusing because it had so many different bits to it . parts that

Boogie Nights is one of the best films to come out of the 90 's and I 'd go so far as to say it should be in the IMDb top 250 . I can actually understand why many would dislike it , due to the subject matter . I personally feel however as many do , judging from the aclaim this film 's received by viewers and critics that it 's topnotch film making. < br / > < br / > The direction and acting in this film surpass good and reach the level of zulchzulu is not one scene in this movie that is n't amazing . The individual characters reach out and touch you . Given that this is a movie about the porn industry , one would n't imagine the sex scenes could be handled with such sensitivity but they are . The direction is among the best I 've ever zulchzulu I 've seen a lot of films. < br / > < br / > The film is n't about one particular personal individual 's story , it 's about zulchzulu 's a character study about people who have many layers to them and who maybe in an industry most would find alien but who still dream the same dreams and have both bad and good to them . Boogie Nights draws you into their story from the beginning , and though the film is long ((()))) ( I believe almost 3 hours ) you honestly do n't even notice . And when it ends you kind of do n't want it to ... . < br / > < br / > I 'm not easy to impress , meaning there are n't many movies I 'd give a 10 of 10 rating to but this is one . Beyond the multiple character study , is the use of music in the film . I have never , in all my years of seeing movies seen music tell a story as well as in this movie.There was such flawlessness to it , you know it 's not something your gon na see everyday. < br / > < br / > Burt reynold 's performance was perhaps the best I 've ever seen him do , and Mark Wahlberg is incredible ( I 'm astounded there are still people saying he does n't

I just got it and it is a great movie ! ! i loved it ! Although Jane Brightons voice n the beginning is so annoying because of her braces she do n't open her freaking mouth ... but ya have to watch it cause its a great movie ! ! the things he says in here are so funny and extremely cute ! ! and I 'm sure Aaron would probably say some of the things in real life cause i do n't know , it just seems that way ! ! ha ha there is a part in tha movie that is really funny ... its wen Jane 's little sister meets him ... but i cant tell ya what happens cause ill just have to let u see for your self ! ! i went to go see Aaron n concert and it was so much fun ! ! n he smelled so good ha ha ... i still cant believe i got to meet him ! ! ! i have pictures if anyone wants to see them ! ! Steph

The actresses bra in a changing room -- well I guess they are preparing young children for changing room time ? ( Boys you must close your eyes at that scene A humongous bra ( 34C which definitely neither of the actresses size ) dangling and supposedly talking -- oh do n't worry if your son takes your bra then Stripping boys ( a girl pulls down a boys pants ) to reveal his boxers -- kids try that at home and in school Beating a girl with male briefs -- nothing wrong . The show likes to show underwear -- panties next ? ? Actress -- at an age below 18 in a revealing bikini -- mom can you buy me one when i reach puberty ? So many sexual innuendos to learn : eg : `` Do n't doubt my ball skills . `` < br / > < br / > '' I like to dance . With my shirt off . `` < br / > < br / > '' Wet and sticky is very icky . Sticky and wet make Mommy upset . `` < br / > < br / > '' I just wan na stick my face in this pie and go zulchzulu . ' '' < br / > < br / > '' I come up with my best ideas when I 'm wet . `` < br / > < br / > '' He sliced my banana ! `` < br / > < br / > '' Come on boy , let 's do it '' < br / > < br / > you 'll never guess where I found this fish '' < br / > < br / > '' I 'll leave you two to zulchzulu '' < br / > < br / > '' Carly ( about Sam ) : She just ditched iCarly to go play with Jonah ? ! `` < br / > < br / > '' You wo n't get respect if your back 's not erect . `` < br / > < br / > '' How 's it hanging '' < br / > < br / > '' What can I say , I 'm a great ball handler '' < br / > < br / > '' Watch me

Does anyone remember the alternative comedy show THE COMIC STRIP PRESENTS . One edition featured Charles Bronson ((()))) ( Robbie Coltrane ) being interviewed about his new movie GLC : < br / > < br / > '' It 's about a man , an ordinary man whose wife and family gets wiped out by creeps and I have to hunt them down and kill them in a sadistic and graphic manner `` < br / > < br / > '' And after GLC what next for Bronson ? `` < br / > < br / > '' We 're using a new angle . My family do n't get wiped out but I go after creeps just the same `` < br / > < br / > This accurately describes THE EVIL THAT MEN DO . It 's a Bronson vigilante thriller where his motivation is n't down to a blood feud but this leads to credibility becoming strained < br / > < br / > Bronson is a retired hit-man who is n't giving up his retirement for anything until someone shows him a video tape featuring interviews with the victims of `` The Doctor `` , not the legendary time traveler but a infamous expert on torture . It 's never really explained why The Doctor is so infamous since any police state has a myriad of these sadists nor is it explained why The Doctor and his sister have ridiculous English accents < br / > < br / > As you may guess it 's a lazily written movie and incidents happening because the screenwriter needs things to happen to further the plot no matter how unlikely they are like one of the bad guys getting invited to a threesome so he can be killed or things being revealed like The Doctor 's sister being a lesbian so some T & A can be included < br / > < br / > In many ways it 's like one of those nasty Chuck Norris vehicles that were being released at the same time , but the most disappointing thing is that the director is also the same man who made ICE COLD IN ALEX and THE GUNS OF zulchzulu two very well regarded war dramas that are often shown on Sunday afternoons . Believe me this movie wo n't be

I did and I lost two and a half hours of my life that I can never regain again. < br / > < br / > I honestly have no idea what the critics and fans see in this movie . And that 's not because I ca n't appreciate `` art '' . I love a good film with profound messages , brilliant cinematography , and great zulchzulu < br / > < br / > This film just is n't one of them. < br / > < br / > My main complaint about this film is that it 's so horribly slow-paced , to the point of boring its audience to death . On the other hand , sequences of dialog go by too quickly and there 's not enough exposition to let people who have n't read the book know what 's going on ( My mother had mercy on me and explained everything before I watched it ) . Would it have killed them to hire a narrator ? At least for the beginning and the end ? (((=)))) < br / > < br / > Let me break it down for you : ( Spoilers throughout ) < br / > < br / > For the first two minutes you are treated to a black screen with no music , waiting for the actual movie to begin. < br / > < br / > For the following minute and a half , you see several pictures of sunrises and savanna landscapes . Like the audience could n't figure out how to set the scene unless they saw the establishing shot three or four times. < br / > < br / > The next eleven minutes are occupied with the grunting monkeys . They fight , see the monolith , fight some more , pommel things with a bone . Supposedly they are prehistoric men whose evolution is being influenced by the monolith 's singing . Not that you could tell if you had n't read the book. < br / > < br / > zulchzulu we get into space . Only to be subjected to twelve minutes of ships slowly spinning to the Blue Danube Waltz ((()))) ( A pretty zulchzulu waltz as I understand , yet here it feels absolutely agonizing ) . At last we get some

zulchzulu ' is probably the word I 'd use to try and start describing this film . I only watched it because it had a good rating on here and i was SO let down. < br / > < br / > Basically the film is about racism in a post 9/11 America and the director went at it with a sledge hammer ! There was no subtlety in the film at all and it felt as though they were trying to achieve a kind of Magnolia feel to the film - which is never a good idea as that film was three hours of tedium and confusion only for it to start raining frogs at the end ... < br / > < br / > All in all a HUGE disappointment .

Susan Slept Here turned out to be Dick Powell 's swan song as a performer on the big screen . Of course he directed some more films and appeared frequently on television until he died . It 's a pity he did n't go out with his performance in The Bad and the Beautiful. < br / > < br / > Frank Tashlin has done so many better films , I 'm still not sure whatever possessed him to do this one . The premise is absolutely laughable . < br / > < br / > Dick Powell is a screenwriter who 's looking to do more serious stuff than the fluff he 's been writing . He had an idea for a film on juvenile delinquency so two friendly cops in Herb Vigran and Horace McMahon deposit 17 year old Debbie Reynolds on his doorstep . She 's not a really bad kid and they do n't want to put her in the system . So they give her to Dick Powell at Christmas time. < br / > < br / > I mean is there anyone out there who does n't see a problem ? The term jailbait comes immediately to mind . Additionally Powell has a girlfriend , the young and sexy Anne Francis . Why Debbie Reynolds is any competition here is beyond me. < br / > < br / > Susan Slept Here got one Oscar nomination . The song Hold My Hand , sung by Don Cornell in the background , was nominated for best song , but lost to Secret Love . < br / > < br / > Powell and Reynolds do have some funny moments together and Alvy Moore as Powell 's factotum and Les Tremayne as his lawyer also get a few laughs . < br / > < br / > But it 's not enough .

`` You know - I 've been in some towns where the girls were n't all that pretty . In fact I 've been in some towns where they 're downright ugly . But it 's the first time I 've been in a town where there are no girls at all '' I am sure the fans of great classic remember this phrase that belongs to Vin ... one of the TRULY magnificent seven ( from the first movie ) ... < br / > < br / > Now I 'd want to re-phrase him here . You know - I 've seen some movies where the plot is n't all that good . In fact I 've seen some movies where the plot is terrible , but that 's first time in my life that I saw the film where there is n't any plot at all. < br / > < br / > OK . Maybe my above statement is little bit over the top , but honestly ... how one can call the plot a crap that is going on in this movie . The bad guy ( oh , do n't ask me to give you his name , because I do n't remember and his not even somehow close to Calvera who 's name and character is unforgettable ... ) is trying to build the church in the name of his late sons , that were killed in some battle , and this bad guy is kidnapping poor villagers to force them to build the church ... < br / > < br / > first of all how big must be church to have to force hundreds of villagers to build it ... is it some Egyptian pyramid or something ? but OK , let 's stop here about the plot and absolutely forgettable character of a bad guy and let 's say few words about The Seven itself ... < br / > < br / > Yul brynner 's good old Chris , always calm , always silent , talking less but talking wise is gone ( unfortunately ) . Oh no ... he 's as calm as he was ... but now , he 's calmness are so fake that you just do n't buy it . ( imagine , he meets a good old friend Chico ,

This movie probably began with a good idea but that 's as far as it went . When I read the cover at Blockbuster I thought it had promise but that was based on the overall idea for the movie . The movie began with a professor talking about how in the future we will be able to see creatures from other dimensions . There was no explanation of how that would happen but that 's okay I thought it would be developed that in the movie . It was n't . In the next scene we see two young men lying on tables with tubes taped to their heads . Beside each one are two attractive women . The men begin asking `` Do you hear that '' or `` Do you see them '' . We conclude they think they are seeing ghosts or some other creature that seem invisible or they are hallucinating . The women do not see these creatures . This was fine for the first five minutes BUT THIS SCENE GOES ON FOR A FULL HOUR . It is briefly punctuated by flashbacks that have no correlation to the so called `` plot '' of the film . We are also introduced to a man in a lab coat and what appear to be Middle Eastern terrorists . What is this about ? We never find out . The flash backs lead us to believe that the terrorists are forcing the man in the lab coat to perform diabolical experiments on these young people but we never understand why . At the end of the movie the terrorists finally do what terrorists do – they blow up the lab , but why ? What is the point ? We have no idea . This film contains so many disconnected thoughts and ideas that there are too many to enumerate but one more notable one is that fact that the man in the lab coats and the terrorist pop in and out of the room throughout the movie and not once do the young men attempt to escape or even leave the tables on which they are laying even though they are not strapped down ! The makers of the movie also bring in cameo appearances by cockroaches on several occasions but again we never learn what that has to do with the storyline .

I love watching steven seagal movies not because of the action of the great plot holes but just because it makes me laugh < br / > < br / > oh it makes me laugh so hard this movie totally got no point and is ridiculous compared to this movie Pearl harbor rocks ! ! ! and Ben affleck need no acting school at all just to give a impression how bad it is < br / > < br / > first off all there so many goofs and bad acting its just getting worse like when steven is try to get out of jail a chopper lands at first the security notice and they led them land when they fly away all of the sudden a guard start shooting < br / > < br / > or when he killed that guy in the car he and treach both walk away you ca n't see no oil on the ground behind him steven notice that there is oil without even watching treach trows a lighter and the car blows up < br / > < br / > and there are plenty of more goofs Steven uses his basic action when someone is pointing a gun at him he grabs it and shoot him totally bullshit (((:)))) ! ! ! like some gangster would let that ever happen. < br / > < br / > the acting is also very worse at the fight scene in the jail outdoor place you can see steven clearly wait to come in action just rewind it a couple of time and you notice the bad acting < br / > < br / > its just makes me laugh i hope one day it comes to the cinema 's here in Holland then i 'll go there with as many friends as possible just to laugh my self to death

I did n't personally know Karen Carpenter , nor , Richard for that matter , so I must go by how the movie portrayed her . I think a better person to ask about it 's accuracy would be her brother Richard . However , from what I did see and learn of Karen , I felt her pain , share her sadness , and she was a very special person to me growing up . I know that I was n't born until 1965 so I did n't get to know her as much as some of you older fans but I definitely grew up listening to her music and I have fond memories of her music . I remember the song about the `` Radio '' ( every sha la la la every whoa ... so fine , ) etc and I remember `` We 've only just begun ! As a matter of fact , I memorized many , many of her songs and some people ( quite a few ) tell me that my voice sounds almost identical to her ! ! ! ( I am not joking on this ) . I also used to be anorexic during high school and part of college ( 1978-1987 ) to be exact and weighed anywhere from 82 pounds to eventually 120 pounds in 1987 . I developed some pretty serious health problems from that which helped me to identify with the actress portraying Karen in the movie . The mother ( Agnes ) was very MUCH like my mother in many ways and I could also feel the pain that Karen must have experienced . For , my mother was often unfeeling , critical , and disapproving as Agnes was ( if this was true to accuracy ) . The movie was helpful in identifying and getting to know Karen on a more personal note by not just hearing her music but by seeing what she was going through . It is quite difficult to portray a person 's entire life in 2-3 hours and recount every single detail perfectly so I would have to say that there is probably no biography that is that accurate . I will give this story an 8 though ! I wish I did know Karen personally ! I would have DIED to meet her ! (((=)))) ! I would have loved

First off , let me say I wasted Halloween movie night by watching this garbage . Second , let me inform you that the current DVD available by Shriek Show is not uncut , so you gore hounds will be very upset . Third , that one scene is the highlight of the film and since it 's been cut , well , you see where I 'm going. < br / > < br / > I know a lot of horror fans dig this movie . It is atmospheric , shot in the woods with some very nice scenery , waterfalls and such . But after the opening kill , which has a very brutal shot of a machete being jammed through a hunter 's crotch , you get no real brutal kills after that . And , with a slasher movie , you sort of want that . At least , I do . The director and co. do nothing new with the killer in the woods idea , several of this type of movie were all made right around the same time in the very early eighties . The only thing this has going for it is that you do n't hate the actors as much as you might in other films . They are sort of likable . The kids have a reason for being there : one of them owns a deed to some property on the mountain . But what is not explained is why his family has property there . There is no cabin or house , so why buy property in East Jesus , especially if you are n't a hunter or whatnot ? Well , I 'm sure some people do buy land for camping purposes , but that just seems unusual . Anyway , two squealing backwoods inbreds show up and start stalking the campers and picking them off one by one . And , as I said before , you get pretty much nothing in the way of decent deaths after the machete kill in the beginning . The ending has a sort of off the wall kill by Connie , but even that is n't enough to save this from being almost equal with the completely forgettable film , The Forest , which is zulchzulu < br / > < br / > If Shriek Show had

I went to see Random Hearts with 3 friends , and at first , I thought maybe it was just me who was n't enjoying the movie . After all , I did n't like As Good As it Gets and that movie won all sorts of awards . Well , it was n't just me ... none of my friends liked it either . It was unbelievable slow , much like getting teeth pulled . The only action that is in the movie is what is in previews . We did n't walk out of the theatre because we all assumed something more would happen . We were n't as smart as the 7 or 8 people who did walk out . I have never walked out on a movie in my life , but I definitely should have . This is all tough for me to write , considering I am relatively easy to please when it comes to movies . It takes a lot for me to think a movie is awesome , but not much for me to just like it . This movie did n't even come close in the like category . Not only was the movie about 2 hours too long , but it was like two separate trite stories in one , but they were n't smoothly sewn together . Plus , the `` soundtrack '' if you could even call it that was so annoying . Like Seinfeld has the same riff that is played over and over again ( difference being that i like Seinfeld ) zulchzulu movie had this jazz riff that it kept playing , which sounded highly inappropriate at times , especially when people were dealing with the deaths of the plane crash . Hard to explain what I mean , but trust me it was awful . I can not say enough to make people not waste their money . After I left the theatre , I honestly wanted to write to the movie company and demand my $ 7 zulchzulu , I could have gone bowling or something for that money .

I absolutely despise this film . I wanted to love it - I really wanted to . But man , oh man - they were SO off with Sara . And the father living was pretty cheesy . That 's straight out of the Shirley Temple film. < br / > < br / > I highly recommend THE BOOK . It is amazing . In the book , Sara is honorable and decent and she does the right thing ... BECAUSE IT IS RIGHT . She does n't have a spiteful bone in her body. < br / > < br / > In the film , she is mean-spirited and spiteful . She does little things to get back at Miss Minchin . In the book , Sara is above such things . She DOES stand up to Miss Minchin . She tells the truth and is not cowed by her . But she does not do the stupid , spiteful things that the Sara in the film does. < br / > < br / > It 's really rather unsettling to me that so many here say they loved the book and they love the movie . I ca n't help but wonder ... did we read the same book ? The whole point of the book was personal responsibility , behaving with honor and integrity , ALWAYS telling the truth and facing adversity with calm and zulchzulu < br / > < br / > Sara has a happy ending in the book - not the ridiculous survival of her father , but the joining with his partner who has been searching for her . In the book , she is taken in by this new father figure who loves and cares for her and Becky . And Miss Minchin is NOT a chimney sweep - that part of the film really was stupid. < br / > < br / > To see all this praise for this wretched film is disturbing to me . We are praising a film that glorifies petty , spiteful behavior with a few tips of the hat to kindness ? Sara in the book was kind to the bone and full of integrity . I do n't even recognize her in the film ... she 's not in it. < br / > < br / > Good

Okay , first I should say that I assume this was just made by a group of friends with a limited budget . With that in mind , it really should n't be compared to blockbuster features and my rating would be higher . But still ... < br / > < br / > After giving it a chance , it still violated some basic film-making rules to such an extent that both the viewer and the amateur director in me cringed . A zulchzulu < br / > < br / > Think : Blair Witch in a car but REALLY boring. < br / > < br / > Think : You left your camcorder on the dashboard and recorded yourself getting lost in the park at night for an hour , then making your friends watch it. < br / > < br / > The scariest part ( POSSIBLE SPOILER ALERT ... IF SPOILING HERE IS POSSIBLE ) was at one point the picture rewinds and you might think you will have to watch it all over again . zulchzulu < br / > < br / > Silliness aside , this is a pretty good idea for a low-budget zulchzulu film . But the concept walks a fine line between being really good and really bad , and let 's just say it was n't really good . There were just too many parts where nothing happened . At first I thought that was the director 's plan -- you were supposed to be lulled into a sense of security and then really scary things would start happening . But ... no. < br / > < br / > I kept trying to find good things to say about it ( and I had plenty of time to think ) , and I 'll say the music was kinda cool . And I have to give the female lead credit for standing around by herself looking scared for a really , really long time . But that 's it . The actors playing `` infected '' people looked as if they were making fun of zombie movies . Or they got their motivation from the Bug wearing his Edgar suit from `` MIB . '' Chances are , if for some strange reason you 're going to watch this movie , it 's

I think this is one of those few movies that I want to rate it as low as possible just to pay it a compliment. < br / > < br / > I have n't seen this movie in about 25 years , so I really ca n't say that much about it . It still seems to be very hard to find on video . But I remember my brother and I stumbled upon it somewhere in the toxic brew of late night UHF channel television of the mid 1980s when I was about 10 years old . So I 've never actually seen the beginning of the movie , but I saw most of it . The first thing I remember is this couple is sneaking out of a campsite and they 're rowing to an island to make out , and then they get attacked by an insane Scotsman in a kilt with an axe ! They manage to escape from him but get attacked by the Loch Ness Monster , which in this movie is just a head and a neck with no body . The eyes and the mouth of the monster do n't even move , it looks like a zulchzulu < br / > < br / > I mean I had just literally never seen anything on this magnitude before and it totally blew my mind . I had seen some bad movies on TV in the early 80s but I had never seen something so totally inept and so casually and thoughtlessly constructed that it seemed like the people who made it spent less time and effort on it than we did watching it . I had already seen some of the Troma films and that type of thing that tries to deliberately be `` campy '' , but this was the pure and real stuff and it was my first encounter with truly great bad film-making . This movie was like the last gasp of the drive-in era and I caught a whiff of it just in time . Actually when we were watching it , we could n't figure out if it was made in the 50s or the 70s . Turns out it came out just a few years before I saw it. < br / > < br / > Later I came into contact with

The major flaw in this Spanish zulchzulu is within it 's script . For the first half hour it 's an okay effort , building some suspense and an atmosphere of fear and dread . We even get some nice killings too ! Then it goes completely downhill and turns into a whole catalog of `` your basic slasher clichés '' . I must admit that I was quite disappointed because the trailer promised so much more . The final thirty minutes consists of some killings and a lot of running around in an abandoned convent . It should have been so much better ( although the final scenes in the flooded room is quite okay ) ! < br / > < br / > First of all , we have the dialog . It 's awful most of the time ( there was quite a few giggles in the audience here and there when I saw it ) and merely adequate elsewhere . It is also barely audible during a lot of scenes , drowning under the pressure of sound effects and the soundtrack ( however that might not be such a bad thing after all considering the stupid lines we have to listen to ! ) . There is one line in the whole movie that makes a reference to the `` I know what you did last summer '' zulchzulu , indicating that the film makers wrote it all as one big joke , but I doubt it. < br / > < br / > And the ending ... well , some will hate it , others will dig it . For me , it was mostly a question of the former because the final twist comes from out of nowhere ! If the audience had been given some clues to the girls mental status , I might have thought otherwise . It also throws all logic out of the window , because the murderer could never had been in place for some of the kills ! But as an avid horror fan I have learned to live with these inconsistencies in Spanish and Italian movies. < br / > < br / > But all is not bad . The movie has a big budget appearance , mainly due to the excellent cinematography ( the scenes from past times really shines here ) ,

Few movies have dashed expectations and upset me as much as Fire has . The movie is pretentious garbage . It does not achieve anything at an artistic level . The only thing it managed to receive is a ban in India . If only it was because of the poor quality of film making rather than the topical controversy , the ban would have been more zulchzulu < br / > < br / > Now that I 've got my distress out of my system , I am more able to analyse the movie : < br / > < br / > * From the onset the movie feels unreal especially when the protagonists start conversing in English . The director , of course , did not make the movie for an Indian audience ; however it underestimated its international audiences by over simplifying it . Watching the character of the domestic help conversing in perfect English is too unreal to be true. < br / > < br / > * Next we get regular glimpses into Radha 's dreams . These scenes are not very effective . They coming up as jarring and obstruct the flow of the movie . I 'm still wondering how that philosophical dialogue connected to the story . I felt that the surrealism was lost. < br / > < br / > * The love scenes felt voyeuristic and are probably meant for audience titillation rather than being a powerful statement . In any case , they do not achieve either of the two. < br / > < br / > * The names chosen for the women , Radha and Sita , are names of Hindu deities and hence been selected to shock the audiences . However , since the film was n't meant for Indian audiences in the first place , the zulchzulu is not meant to achieve its goal , which is zulchzulu < br / > < br / > * The quality of direction is very poor and some key and delicate scenes have been poorly handled . A better director could have made a powerful emotional drama out of the subject. < br / > < br / > * The acting felt wooden although Nandita Das brought some life into the role , the others were wasted . I always thought

I consider myself a fan of Jess Franco and his trash movies , but nearly every time I see one of them , I just see missed opportunities and plots that do n't play out well . This film is , unfortunately , no different . The film certainly had a lot of potential , as Franco has fused the intriguing theme of the classic film zulchzulu Most Dangerous Game ' with his usual brand of trashy sleaze , but the plot here gets lost too often , and it takes an eternity for Franco to get round to the main point of the movie . With this being a later Franco film , you might be forgiven for thinking that the director would have got better , but actually I 've found that the opposite is true ; as this and the terrible zulchzulu zulchzulu ' are two of his very worst films . The plot focuses on a stripper and her sleazy boyfriend . The pair is invited to a private island by a rich woman and her lover . However , they soon find that they have n't been invited there for social reasons as they are zulchzulu ' on the island so that the wealthy woman and her friends can hunt them down for sport ! < br / > < br / > What attracted me to this film was the front cover and the fact that it was directed by the king of sleaze flicks . You 'd think , then , that I 'd be pleased that the movie features a plethora of sex scenes and general sleaze ; but I 'm not . The reason for this is mostly that the sex and sleaze in the film is really boring and most of the time served only in giving me the condition known as zulchzulu fast forward finger ' (((;)))) . However , my inclination to see everything through to the end ensured that I had to lump it (((;-)))) . There was a time when I did n't think girl-on-girl could possibly be boring , but I have since been proved wrong . The only positive I can pluck out the movie really is that the soundtrack is quite catchy , and despite it being silly foreign pop music ; actually blends quite well with the sex scenes . I did enjoy the

I would consider myself a fan of Dean Koontz ; having read a number of his novels and liked them all , but unfortunately I never got around to reading Watchers so I 'm left with no choice but to rate this film on it 's own merits rather than comparing it to the book that I have n't read . I went into this expecting something awful , and while I did n't exactly get a brilliant horror film ; I am lead to believe that it 's fans of the book that are rating it down because as a film in it 's own right , Watchers is an entertaining and somewhat original little horror movie . The plot obviously takes some influence from Predator and begins with an explosion at a research lab . It 's not long before a rancher is killed by some strange beast and the boyfriend of the dead man 's daughter has picked up an ultra-intelligent runaway dog . A secret Government agency is soon on the case , as the murders continue . The boy continues to be fascinated by the dog 's intelligence , but it somehow ties in with the murders and the agency is soon on his tail too. < br / > < br / > The script for this film was originally written by Paul Haggis , who later disowned it . I do n't know why – the writing here is nowhere near as ridiculous as his 2004 hit Crash ! Anyway , the main reason this film works is undoubtedly the dog , who aside from being rather cute , is also the best actor in the film . Corey Haim , hot off the success of The Lost Boys is the human lead and actually has a rather good chemistry with the dog , although it is a little bit ridiculous seeing him talk to it most of the way through the film . The plot is rather convoluted and as such the film is more than a little bit messy ; but the ridiculousness of it all pulls it through during the more awkward moments . Michael Ironside also appears in the film and does well as the zulchzulu cop ' side of the Government agents . The monster is , of course , one of the most interesting things about the

Due to rather dubious plate tectonics , Japan starts to slip under the sea . Initial predictions say it 'll take about 40 years before the country is submerged , but a rogue scientist adds in some even more dubious science and determines it will actually take less than 1 year ! The government think he 's a crackpot , but evidence soon starts bearing his theory out. < br / > < br / > This big budget disaster movie follows the formula set by any number of Hollywood films of the late 90 's ( I assume , having seen none of them ) , with the scale of disaster and tragedy bringing out the nobility of the human ( well , Japanese ) spirit in acts of heroism and sacrifice , and proving the power of love or something like that . i.e . it 's as naive in its psychology as it 's geology ... we all know that half the populace would be out raping and looting the minute they thought the police had their back turned , and the other half would just panic and be useless. < br / > < br / > The film does have some very nice special effects , but is not as slick or expensive looking as an equivalent Hollywood production would be . It is at least as nationalistic , humourless and lacking in self-awareness as that Hollywood film would be though , and probably has even worse acting . It does have the hot evil chick from Battle Royale as one of the leads ... but she 's not even slightly evil , and is therefore much less hot. < br / > < br / > The film is much too long at 132 minutes , and gets worse and worse as it progresses towards a conclusion that had me in danger of puking . I certainly did n't care in the slightest whether Japan sank or not by the half way point , and well before the end I was trying to think of ways to expedite the process should I ever find myself in that situation for real. < br / > < br / > But , it does have nice special effects , and Kou Shibasaki is still pretty hot , so I magnanimously give it ... 3/10 .

Dick and Jane Harper ( Jim Carrey , Téa Leoni ) wind up on the unemployment line when the corporation Dick works for is caught in a corruption scandal , and after desperately and unsuccessfully trying to find jobs , the duo turns to crime in order to get them out of zulchzulu < br / > < br / > I 've always been a fan of Jim Carrey . It 's been awhile since he has made a straight up comedy . The last one was Bruce Almighty which was pretty good . He has proved that he can do serious dramas but comedy is his real element . Fun with Dick and Jane proves that he still has it . Even though the film was funny , it was still kind of disappointing . It was n't as funny as I thought it would be . It 's worth watching once though unlike most of Carrey 's movies , it does n't have a good repeat value . Part of the problem is the script . I was surprised the script was weak since this is the same guy that made The Forty Year Old Virgin . Some of the jokes just fall flat and other times they seem to be trying too hard . If Jim Carrey was n't in it , than the film would have been a lot worse. < br / > < br / > Next to Jim Carrey is Téa Leoni . She 's an okay actress but she just is n't very funny . She does n't match up well with Carrey and she seemed to be phoning in her performance . They should have gone with someone else . The supporting cast includes Alec Baldwin , Richard Jenkins and Aaron Michael Jenkins . The latter plays Billy Harper and he actually gives a decent performance . He was n't as annoying as most child stars are . Alec Baldwin was okay and Richard Jenkins tried too hard to be funny . To be honest , I 'm a little bias here . The film altogether was pretty average but I liked it more because of Jim Carrey 's performance . Fans of Jim Carrey should enjoy it but that 's about it . In the end , Fun with Dick and Jane is a fun way to spend 90

An American boy goes to Paris after his mother commits suicide , becomes and artist and then discovers himself and returns to the States so he can make things right with his former friends. < br / > < br / > I have to think that the people who are rating this movie so highly are all X-Files fans , even though there are no aliens or serial killers in it . Do n't be fooled , this movie blows zulchzulu < br / > < br / > The story is incoherent , with little or no explanation of what people are doing or why . When you do get an explanation , it does n't fit the story that went before it . What it does is bore you . For all the acting talent in the film , it just is n't interesting . I spent the whole movie wondering when sex-addict Duchovny was going to bang someone . Maybe he was doing it behind the scenes ; they should have filmed that instead. < br / > < br / > What comes across is a story of a self-obsessed artist worrying about minor incidents in his life and wanting to make them right somehow - even though they did n't seem that wrong to begin with . There are n't any particularly interesting or shocking revelations , despite the mention of a big secret in the first few minutes . It 's just a guy thinking that his life is as interesting to you as it is to him . It 's not. < br / > < br / > I saw in the trivia that Duchovny claims he wrote the script in a week , that 's entirely believable . The guy can act , there 's no doubt , but writing and directing are obviously beyond his zulchzulu < br / > < br / > Why Hollywood keeps greenlighting these self-discovery stories is beyond me . I discover myself in the shower every morning but I do n't bother making a movie about it . Mine would probably be better than this one , though ; at least there would be some nudity .

My college theater just had a special screening last night of this film . I have got to say that I think everyone was impressed with how good this movie was . Though , my roommate did n't care for it but he 's not into horror movies anyway and just went to see if Paris Hilton can act . By the way , if you 're worried about that , do n't be . I 'm not exactly one of her fans , but I must be honest and say she was pretty good and she has the best death scene . Overall , all the actor 's were very good . I 'm not gon na go into detail for the plot since I 'm sure you know about it . zulchzulu , the characters are pretty engaging and you actually care for them , especially Elisha Cuthbert and Chad Michael Murray 's characters . We meet them as rival siblings and end with them having to work together . Another plus is that it does not have the sleek look of Amityville Horror or Texas Chainsaw Massacre and feels almost documentary-like rather than a music video ( Do n't get me wrong , I loved Texas Chainsaw and enjoyed Amityville ) . < br / > < br / > Now for the death scenes . In most slasher movies , whenever a character is stabbed or killed , the scene immediately cuts away to another scene , but not in this one . When a character is about to die , they die pretty gruesomely . But the filmmakers do n't stop there and add a little something extra each time for each victim . I wo n't say anything about the death scenes and will let you see them for yourself. < br / > < br / > While this is a great slasher movies , it does have the flaws of almost all slasher films ( exploring a creepy house when you should n't be , getting a ride with a suspicious character , splitting up , and screaming so the killer can hear you ) . Also , there is a kinda stupid plot twist that was unnecessary and did n't add to the film at all . You could tell it was just added in at the last moment and if

OK , I saw this film through Mystery Science Theater 3000 , but I did see the movie , so I figured I would leave a comment on it . I just love once again how Joe gets stuck with the crummy roles while his brother and nephew 's are just getting the Oscar winning roles left and right . Soultaker is technically what you would call the movie that was meant to be good . It seemed like the director and actors just took this movie extremely seriously and had very cheesy effects , a story that did n't make much sense , and not to mention pretty crummy acting abilities . This is one of my favorite MST3K episodes , simple because a lot of what they mention is what we are thinking throughout the film and I 'll explain why in a moment. < br / > < br / > Natalie and Zach are a couple who broke up and are now trying to work things over . But since Zach is in upper lower class and Natalie is in middle class , it just ai n't gon na work . But on the way home , they and Zach 's friends get into a car accident and now the angel of zulchzulu is after them to meet his quota of zulchzulu . But also it seems like he 's had some kind of other life relationship with Natalie and just ca n't seem to move on . So now Natalie and Zach must race against the ever appearing five million times a minute clock to save their souls and lives. < br / > < br / > Well , I guess Zeppelin was wrong when he sang that there was a stairway to Heaven , I wonder if Black zulchzulu was wrong too , lol . Basically there are a lot of plot holes in this movies , like no one can see the characters and they ca n't be killed , yet somehow they can still press buttons and open doors ? The Angel of Death had a very strange face and was a bit distracting from the story itself . Soultaker was just a lousy film that was rushed and makes you just feel so bad for Joe , the under-appreciated zulchzulu brother. < br / > < br / > 2/10

I walked into a book store in Brentwood , Tennessee . I am not going to say the name because I am a dedicated customer . I have been satisfied with every item I purchased there before this one (((=)))) . On display in the front of the store was The Bell Witch Haunting . ( Might I mention this is the only store I have seen it for sale in . ) I had heard about the story somewhere and remembered it was supposed to have really happened for real . I was very excited and could n't wait to watch it . I had great expectations for it . I could n't believe what I seen when I viewed it . It did n't look like a real movie . It looked like a home video . I was under the impression it was suppose to be a horror movie . I mean the movie was suppose to be about a witch haunting you know . This is no horror movie . You will not jump out of your seat watching this movie . I gave the movie all the chances in the world to get better as it went along . I swear I did . It never did get any better . There were several scenes of this little kid getting poop and pee thrown on him . I did n't find that entertaining at all . I watched the whole movie with disbelief that the store would actually sell this to me . I guess that is how bad this economy has got . I have this to say to the cast and crew . Do not show this film as material to get other film jobs . Do n't do it . I mean that sincerely . I commend you for trying . For people who have bought this . I say this . Do n't sell your copy to someone . They could get very upset . Have a nice day everyone .

When you first sit down to watch this movie , keep in mind that you are about to see something you 've probably never seen before . Keep in mind that this is a movie where they obviously spent INSANE amounts of cash on explosions and not enough on acting or anything else for that matter . The crazy thing I noticed is that every character is completely zulchzulu , and it seems ( most of the time anyhow ) that the film had been zulchzulu ' to make the characters move faster ! ( I wonder if the Hong Kong version was dubbed too ? ) I understand the cartoon had this , but it does n't work for live-action . It just looks odd ... as if the camera crew decided to act because they could n't afford real zulchzulu < br / > < br / > The English version is horribly dubbed , and the character 's words do not match the mouths at all . I would have preffered subtitles , but since this is a kids movie , and since some kids can not read well , I 'll let it go . But there is something extremely odd about this movie . It 's supposedly a kids movie , but there 's a lot of material about SEX , RAPE , and STRIPPING which is n't exactly for young Western audiences . ( In the Orient , they have different laws and sexuality in children 's movies is much more accepted ) . But parents be warned ! There is a scene where two characters talk about rape , multiple scenes where people say zulchzulu maniac ' and a scene where this insanely young japanese girl does a sexy dance for one of the zulchzulu maniacs ' and shows him her breasts ! Who was this movie made for anyway ? < br / > < br / > Oh , and the special effects are laughable . You can tell the spaceship-like things that bomb the village are cardboard cutouts ( or animation , I was n't sure ) that look unconvincing , even to a kid . The makers of this movie left out a lot of cool things from the cartoon , simply because they could n't budget the kind of money they 'd need . I did n't like

Basically the first two Critters movie were already silly ones but in a good and entertaining way . This movie is way more of a B-movie , that is silly but for all of the wrong reasons. < br / > < br / > This is the first sequel that does n't really follows the plot of the first two movies . Basically all of the characters are new and there are no bounty hunters this time ( well , as good as none , since the bounty hunter in this movie shows up far too late ) and the budget for this one obviously went down again . To save even more costs , the movie got shot back-to-back with part 4 , which I imaging will be just as bad , since it directly follows this movie and got made by the same people involved as with this one. < br / > < br / > It 's just a typical zulchzulu movie , that does n't really have any originality in it or brings entertainment . It makes `` Critters 3 '' a real redundant sequel , you can easily do without . Granted that things could had been way worse for this movie but it just ai n't exactly a good one either . The movie just falls flat as a zulchzulu < br / > < br / > Also kind of strange to notice how the Critters has suddenly changed in this one . They are about double their usual size this time , without giving an explanation for that and they are even more Gremlins like in this movie than was the case in the previous one. < br / > < br / > The movie is only made interesting because this was the feature film debut of Leonardo DiCaprio . He was about 17 in this movie and of course looking baby-faced like he still does now . I like watching this well known actors in their early roles . It 's fun to see how they act and if their style has improved and changed over the years . Of course DiCaprio got only better but he already was kind of delivering his lines in the same way as he does these days. < br / > < br / > Really a too silly and lame movie.

I saw this film when it premiered in LA . I think I laughed 2 or three times . The rest of the time I was in shock at how zulchzulu shot and poorly written it was . Kirby is in fact the only saving grace in the film . I was disappointed at the performance of Larry Bagby , whom I usually find entertaining . If you enjoy watching your friend 's crappy homemade short films that they shot on their mom 's 8mm video camera then there 's a slight chance you might enjoy this film . Then again part of what makes those movies enjoyable is that it 's your buddies playing all the parts . You do n't know these people so you 'll probably find it as dull and stupid as I did . Dear Mr. Nelson , go back to film school , intern for a while as a PA or a grip or some low level job so you can see how things are properly done in film . Then look for as long as you must to find a Director of Photography who knows what f. stop means , make sure he has ND filter on hand . Then try again . Repeat as many times as needed .

The Internet is a wondrous thing is it not ? I am watching a taped episode of one of my all time favorite documentaries , `` Vietnam (((:)))) : The Ten Thousand Day War '' , from my DVR in Florida USA to my laptop in Kuwait ; I 'm writing a review about this series and have just read another review from someone who actually lives in Vietnam ! Amazing . I would like to just say that for Minh Nguyen to make the statement that America brought the war to Vietnam is one sided . I know America was the main player in the west but it takes two sides to wage war . The Soviets and the Chinese were major arms providers to the North so why Mr Nguyen does n't mention them as partially to blame is showing an ignorance ( well , I think we all know why he does n't mention them , either ignorance from being raised in a communist system and its political dogma , or because he to scared to say the truth for fear of being zulchzulu ) . Also , Mr Nguyen , I guess the parts about the North being the main aggressor it whole war were not shown in your country so to blame America again shows ignorance . Regardless , its interesting to read a review from Vietnam ( of course that could be made up as well but I 'll take that as real ) , at least the communist east is somewhat open . As far as the mini series ; why do I love it ? It does n't focus on the American involvement solely . This was a war that started 15 years before America got involved and the series covers every facet of the history so thats a real plus . The footage used is first rate , all the Vietnam War programs you see made now will use the same footage so you are not missing anything by watching this older series . The date this series was made is another plus . It has all the major players being interviewed which you ca n't do now because they are dead from old age , it 's a major historical reference . Third , Richard Basehart adds a very distinctive narrative voice , his voice sounds as distinguished as James Earl

zulchzulu - sorry ! * The first word that sprung to mind whilst watching the film is zulchzulu ' . It 's the only critters movie I have seen from the four movies , but I enjoyed it . It was n't too complicated as I had n't seen the past two , but I thought it was quite a good movie all the same . < br / > < br / > Critters starts with a man , his son and daughter stopping off on the way to a vacation ( although it turns out that they end up at their own home - which I have no idea what the hell went on ) The girl meets up with a boy ( played by Leo DiCaprio ) and they go hang out in a nearby forest . They meet this weird guy who tells them to be careful and stuff because of the critters . He seems a bit psychotic and if I was in that situation , I would not speak to him . The critters steal a ride of the girl and boy 's car and end up in their flat thing . They hide out in the basement and end up killing this lazy jerk . They then nearly kill this fat woman and the girl 's dad . They are chased higher and higher up the flat until they hide in the attic . The critters eat stuff in the kitchen ( Spoof of the gremlins kitchen scene ? ? ? ! ) And I ca n't remember ( not a good thing ) but I 'm sure they have to go back for something/someone . Anyway they end up getting out and saved . The psychotic guy comes back and before he kills the last two critters he is told he ca n't because they are endangered and so he sends them home. < br / > < br / > The ending was disappointing and I was annoyed that only the lazy guy died as there were quite a few annoying characters I would personally have killed off . It 's a thrilling , exciting movie worth a watch . But , if you 're looking for a better version of this genre I recommend the gremlins movies . Sorry !